Peer Review

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed. The accepted research articles will be available online (free download) following the journal peer-reviewing process. The language used in this Journal is English. Detailed information about reviewing is available in the Reviewer Kit.

Reviewing a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Hence, the IJISSE Editorial Board, Authors, and Audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility and your dedication. IJISSE adheres to a double-blind peer-review process that is rapid and fair, and also ensures a high quality of articles published. In so doing, IJISSE needs reviewers who can provide insightful and helpful comments on submitted manuscripts with a turnaround time of about 4 weeks. Maintaining IJISSE as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts.

If the IJISSE Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following:

  • Reviewing manuscripts critically, but constructively, and preparing detailed comments to help authors improve their work.

  • Reviewing multiple versions of a manuscript as necessary.

  • Providing all required information within established deadlines.

  • Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal.

  • Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript they are asked to review.

  • Reporting possible research misconduct.

  • Suggesting alternative reviewers in case they cannot review the manuscript for any reason.

  • Treating the manuscript as a confidential document.

  • Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript.

  • Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow they identify the authors.

  • Not identifying themselves to authors.

  • Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer.

  • Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work.

  • Informing the editor if they find that the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to their knowledge.

  • Writing review reports in English only.

  • Authoring a commentary for publication related to the reviewed manuscript.

The following items need to be reviewed:

  • Novelty of the topic

  • Originality

  • Scientific reliability

  • Valuable contribution to science

  • Addition of new aspects to the existing field of study

  • Ethical aspects

  • Structure of the submitted article and its relevance to the authors’ guidelines

  • References provided to substantiate the content

  • Grammar, punctuation, and spelling

  • Scientific misconduct