Peer Review
The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed. The accepted research articles will be available online (free download) following the journal peer-reviewing process. The language used in this Journal is English. Detailed information about reviewing is available in the Reviewer Kit.
Reviewing a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Hence, the IJISSE Editorial Board, Authors, and Audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility and your dedication. IJISSE adheres to a double-blind peer-review process that is rapid and fair, and also ensures a high quality of articles published. In so doing, IJISSE needs reviewers who can provide insightful and helpful comments on submitted manuscripts with a turnaround time of about 4 weeks. Maintaining IJISSE as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts.
If the IJISSE Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following:
-
Reviewing manuscripts critically, but constructively, and preparing detailed comments to help authors improve their work.
-
Reviewing multiple versions of a manuscript as necessary.
-
Providing all required information within established deadlines.
-
Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal.
-
Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript they are asked to review.
-
Reporting possible research misconduct.
-
Suggesting alternative reviewers in case they cannot review the manuscript for any reason.
-
Treating the manuscript as a confidential document.
-
Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript.
-
Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow they identify the authors.
-
Not identifying themselves to authors.
-
Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer.
-
Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work.
-
Informing the editor if they find that the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to their knowledge.
-
Writing review reports in English only.
-
Authoring a commentary for publication related to the reviewed manuscript.
The following items need to be reviewed:
-
Novelty of the topic
-
Originality
-
Scientific reliability
-
Valuable contribution to science
-
Addition of new aspects to the existing field of study
-
Ethical aspects
-
Structure of the submitted article and its relevance to the authors’ guidelines
-
References provided to substantiate the content
-
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling
-
Scientific misconduct










